Independent tasting club / est. by the 24.4 (KU’s Dept. of Neuroscience)Good taste is debatable.
Energy drinks.
Strong opinions.
Latest tastingsThe last three rated drinks.
Pick one to take a closer look.
Pick one to take a closer look.
58 drinks in the archive278 recorded ratings36 contributorsEvery palate counts.
All flavours welcome
The collection↘
Checking for new approved ratings…
Brand
Rater
Sort by
Minimum ratings
| No. | Drink | Mean / 5 | Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 4 | ||
| 02 | 2 | ||
| 03 | 4 | ||
| 04 | 3 | ||
| 05 | 4 | ||
| 06 | 5 | ||
| 07 | 2 | ||
| 08 | 5 | ||
| 09 | 4 | ||
| 10 | 4 | ||
| 11 | 5 | ||
| 12 | 5 | ||
| 13 | 2 | ||
| 14 | 4 | ||
| 15 | 4 | ||
| 16 | 8 | ||
| 17 | 4 | ||
| 18 | 7 | ||
| 19 | 4 | ||
| 20 | 5 | ||
| 21 | 6 | ||
| 22 | 7 | ||
| 23 | 3 | ||
| 24 | 3 | ||
| 25 | 5 | ||
| 26 | 2 | ||
| 27 | 5 | ||
| 28 | 3 | ||
| 29 | 11 | ||
| 30 | 4 | ||
| 31 | 6 | ||
| 32 | 1 | ||
| 33 | 4 | ||
| 34 | 4 | ||
| 35 | 5 | ||
| 36 | 7 | ||
| 37 | 6 | ||
| 38 | 7 | ||
| 39 | 4 | ||
| 40 | 7 | ||
| 41 | 4 | ||
| 42 | 3 | ||
| 43 | 3 | ||
| 44 | 6 | ||
| 45 | 5 | ||
| 46 | 8 | ||
| 47 | 6 | ||
| 48 | 8 | ||
| 49 | 6 | ||
| 50 | 4 | ||
| 51 | 6 | ||
| 52 | 6 | ||
| 53 | 3 | ||
| 54 | 5 | ||
| 55 | 6 | ||
| 56 | 3 | ||
| 57 | 4 | ||
| 58 | 7 |
Averages are unweighted means of recorded scores. Small samples can sit high in the rankings; use the minimum-ratings filter to compare more established favourites.
Personal taste.
Collective archive.
Jitterpedia brings together the group's energy-drink ratings. Each entry records a brand, a flavour, a name, and a score from zero to five.
Anyone can submit a rating without an account. João reviews submissions before they appear in the collection. Names are self-declared; approval records a contribution, not a verified identity.